{"id":1870,"date":"2013-01-20T21:23:39","date_gmt":"2013-01-20T21:23:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/etims.net\/?p=1870"},"modified":"2013-01-20T21:23:39","modified_gmt":"2013-01-20T21:23:39","slug":"should-celtic-sell-gary-hooper","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/etims.net\/?p=1870","title":{"rendered":"Should Celtic sell Gary Hooper?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Two goals and an all-round impressive performance against the 2nd biggest team in the league yesterday underlined the value of Gary Hooper to Celtic. The English striker &#8211; signed in 2010 from Scunthorpe United (amusingly called Firewall FC by the Guardian) &#8211; has been in scintillating form this season with 20 goals in 30 games.<\/p>\n<p>After being the subject of a \u00a35m bid from Norwich, and having only 18 months to go on his contract, the question is being asked: should Celtic sell Gary Hooper?<\/p>\n<p>Since arriving at Celtic, Hooper has scored 71 goals in 116 games. That&#8217;s a strike-rate of 61.2%. This season his strike-rate has upped to 66.7%. The striker would have been in the England squad for their Zlatan-inspired defeat to Sweden in August had he been fit.<\/p>\n<p>All of which makes \u00a35m a laughable offer, especially when you consider Loic Remy &#8211; with 1 goal in 16 games for Marseille &#8211; has just joined QPR for \u00a38m. Although, when you take Harry&#8217;s % off that it was probably 50p he was actually valued at.<\/p>\n<p>No, Hooper is worth much more than \u00a35m. The problem for Celtic is his contract situation. Should we try and keep Hooper for a shot at Juventus? We will win the league with or without him regardless, but I believe he is critical to any hopes we have against Turin&#8217;s finest crooks.<\/p>\n<p>In the last 18 months Hooper&#8217;s link-up play and ability to forage as a loan striker in Europe has come on leaps and bounds. He&#8217;s scored 4 goals in 9 European games this season, and when you consider the calibre of opposition we have played, that&#8217;s pretty decent. However, it has been his ability to harry and harass, as well as finish even the merest of sniffs, which makes him a must stay for Juve.<\/p>\n<p>The ideal situation for Celtic is that Hooper signs a new deal. We bump up his pay and he stays. We put a clause in there of say, \u00a310m+, which means that we will get a very decent return on our investment and player who knows that if he continues to shine and who knows, plays a part in our journey closer to Wembley, then bigger clubs with more means and ambition than Norwich will come a-calling.<\/p>\n<p>This is similar to the situation we faced with Petrov when he moved to Villa in 2006. Stan was agitating for a move. He wanted to go down south, but by signing his new deal earlier in 2006 it ensured we got decent money for him (c. \u00a37m if memory serves). I expect Lawwell will be having conversations with Hooper&#8217;s representatives dangling such a carrot. There may not be a formal release clause &#8211; that&#8217;s so very Spanish &#8211; but I expect there will be a gentleman&#8217;s agreement made with regards to what we do with him in the summer.<\/p>\n<p><strong>So, should Celtic sell Gary Hooper?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Eventually that is inevitable. But not in January and certainly not for \u00a35m. We would get that in the summer anyway. I expect, new deal or not, we have Hooper for another six months. The question is whether we get what he is worth or a depressed price due to his contract running out. Sign a new deal, Gary. Play your heart out, dump Juventus out of the ECL and get into that England squad. If you leave in the summer for \u00a310m+ then I don&#8217;t think there is a single Celtic fan who would grudge you the move under these circumstances.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Two goals and an all-round impressive performance against the 2nd biggest team in the league yesterday underlined the value of Gary Hooper to Celtic. The&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":1871,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/etims.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/01\/Hooper-v-Spartak.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2J7If-ua","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/etims.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1870"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/etims.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/etims.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/etims.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/etims.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1870"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/etims.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1870\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1874,"href":"https:\/\/etims.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1870\/revisions\/1874"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/etims.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1871"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/etims.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1870"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/etims.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1870"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/etims.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1870"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}