<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Could that explain why the board don’t seem to care about several ongoing issues ?<\/p>\n
Is their custodial period about to draw to a close ?<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
There is no pleasure on criticising the board, some would argue that is all some of us do when we get the laptops out, but there are times when questions have to be asked, and as a PLC, shareholders and supporters alike have a right to demand answers.<\/p>\n
But as is often the case in the murky world of business, just as in politics, the issue isn’t finding the answers, it’s finding the right questions.<\/p>\n
If we were simply to ask if what the board are doing about, say, alleged corruption at the SFA and Resolution 12, they would simply reply that they are collecting evidence, like they did when they asked for a smoking gun.<\/p>\n
They got the smoking gun, so the follow up must be<\/p>\n
“When are you going to use it ? ”<\/p>\n
As regards the SFA and their ineptness to efficiently run the game, why don;t the board at least attempt to hold them to account ?<\/p>\n
More worryingly, why is a public company conducting any negotiations about any issue in private ?<\/p>\n
Public companies should not be under the rule of institutions that do not offer transparency as a matter of course.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Yesterday, we had this..<\/p>\n
![](\"https:\/\/pbs.twimg.com\/card_img\/1176453516732375040\/lKs1Ydjw?format=jpg&name=small\")
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n